On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 28 December 2010 15:28, Oliver Kullmann wrote: >> >> So cleaning the environment etc. is of no help, these ~ 11000 chars >> don't go away. Strange that the gcc-guys don't circumvent these problems. >> Sigh. > > Strange that you assume noone will do so. A quick web search would > have found, for example, > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155 which shows that > such problems are considered a bug and fixed as necessary. > > Maybe noone else has encountered the particular variant of bug you > have trouble with, so please file a bugzilla report, thanks. > Or perhaps he is questioning why the fix is available via a patch instead of simply incorporating the patch into the sources so people can use the source without a bunch of extra grief...
