On 11/29/2010 01:59 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >>> None of the rpm or manual built of GCC picked the dependency on >>> libgcc.i686 either (executing yum-builddep gcc-4.4.5-2.fc13.src.rpm >>> lists all the dependencies EXCEPT for libgcc.i686). I'm surprised that is a dependency: you're building a cross-compiler from x86-64 to i686. The gcc build will build libgcc for all its multilibs. >> >> Again, talk to Fedora. >> > If I know how/where I will...The only way I can think of is to submit a > bug via Bugzilla. I don't think that would help. We haven't yet established that there is a bug. >>> There is another problem though - >>> >>> [root@test1 ~]# ls -las /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.4/32/ >>> total 3464 >>> 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Nov 26 23:40 . >>> 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Nov 26 23:40 .. >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1740 Nov 26 20:46 crtbegin.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2164 Nov 26 20:46 crtbeginS.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2048 Nov 26 20:46 crtbeginT.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1312 Nov 26 20:46 crtend.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1568 Nov 26 20:46 crtendS.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4088 Nov 26 20:46 crtfastmath.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2100 Nov 26 20:46 crtprec32.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2108 Nov 26 20:46 crtprec64.o >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2100 Nov 26 20:46 crtprec80.o >>> 3236 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 3311740 Nov 26 20:46 libgcc.a >>> 48 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 45148 Nov 26 20:46 libgcc_eh.a >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Nov 26 23:40 libgcc_s.so -> >>> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 >>> 36 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 33982 Nov 26 20:46 libgcov.a >>> 92 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 92262 Nov 26 20:46 libgomp.a >>> -->----- >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 28 Nov 26 23:40 libgomp.so -> >>> ../../../../libgomp.so.1.0.0 >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 45 Nov 26 23:40 libmudflap.a -> >>> ../../../i686-redhat-linux/4.4.5/libmudflap.a >>> ---<----- >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 39 Nov 26 20:46 libmudflap.so >>> -->----- >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 47 Nov 26 23:40 libmudflapth.a -> >>> ../../../i686-redhat-linux/4.4.5/libmudflapth.a >>> ---<----- >>> 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 41 Nov 26 20:46 libmudflapth.so >>> -->----- >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 44 Nov 26 23:40 libstdc++.a -> >>> ../../../i686-redhat-linux/4.4.5/libstdc++.a >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 31 Nov 26 23:40 libstdc++.so -> >>> ../../../../libstdc++.so.6.0.13 >>> 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 44 Nov 26 23:40 libsupc++.a -> >>> ../../../i686-redhat-linux/4.4.5/libsupc++.a >>> ---<----- >>> >>> The symlinks above (with the exception of libgcc_s.so.1 which is OK >>> once I MANUALLY install libgcc.i686) are all DEAD - none of these >>> files are installed by gcc or any other package, nor are they picked >>> up as a required dependency. I do not think that's right. >>> >> >> Those files come from glibc, specifically the glibc-devel.i686 package. >> > No, they are not! The last 3 DEAD symlinks come from libstdc++.i686, > which is (or should be as its x86_64 counterpart is compiled in) part of > the GCC packages (at least that is the case with Fedora). It is a gcc package; you haven't installed it. /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.4/32/libstdc++.so --> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13 $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.13 libstdc++-4.4.4-10.fc12.i686 > libmudflap* is also built as part > of the GCC package on Fedora, but again, the i686 counterpart is NOT > built nor is it provided. Same goes for the libgomp.i686 package - > x86_64 is built, libgomp.i686 is not built, nor provided. Madness - > multilib my ar**! You surely don't expect all the legacy 32-bit stuff to be installed by default. Andrew.
