On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think that part would be all that hard. gcc requires the stack > pointer to be valid on function entry, but it doesn't particularly care > what happens on function exit. Naturally most current epilogue routines > restore the stack; you would just have to change the epilogue code to do > something else. Of course the caller would have to always use a frame > pointer, but that is already supported so that gcc works when stack > space is allocated dynamically. Ian, Thanks, I feel reassured. By the way, thanks for your wonderful series on linkers. Cheers, John
