Kraiser <pietiatibia1@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Ian Lance Taylor-3 wrote: >> >> Kraiser <pietiatibia1@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> It's my problem actually any possible way to do that ? >>> well -m32 isn't actually what i'm looking for because it compiles code >>> for >>> 32-bit enviorment along with pointers(32 bit) i need pointers to be >>> 64-bit >>> but long = 32bit just like it is on Windows LLP64. >>> If the feature isn't exist maybe it would be awesome to add this in >>> future >>> releases of GCC :? >>> seems like more people needs it: >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1857296/can-gcc-on-ubuntu-on-a-64-bit-machine-generate-an-executable-where-long-is-32-bit >> >> Compiler options of this sort are problematic because they change the >> ABI. That is, code compiled with this option can not be safely linked >> with code compiled without this option. Code compiled with this >> option can not be safely used with dynamic librares compiled without >> this option. Code compiled with this option can not safely make >> system calls on a kernel compiled without this option (e.g., on >> GNU/Linux, the stat structure includes fields of type unsigned long, >> so the stat system call will not work as expected). >> >> So the only people who can safely use this option are people who are >> prepared to recompile their entire system. >> >> It's a very simple change to make to the source code, but that doesn't >> necessarily mean that it is a good idea. >> >> Ian >> >> > There is an option in config of linux kernel to recompile kernel with it ? Not as far as I know. Ian