On 04/20/2010 01:45 AM, Thomas M. Alldread wrote:
RAMBBTEST(varName,bit) (uint32_t)&varName-SRAM_BASE*32+4*bit+SRAM_BB_BASE
I noticed that there is no "( )" around "&varName-SRAM_BASE" compared to your original code. This might be the cause that you got better code since symbol + constant can be handled well while symbol * constant + constant cannot.
-- Jie Zhang CodeSourcery (650) 331-3385 x735
