Re: _mm_malloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nibbs22@xxxxxxx writes:

> I thought I was guaranteed to have  _mm_malloc return array addresses
> that are aligned to 16 bytes
> and that the compiler would recognize this.

The first is true.  The second is currently not.  That is a bug in the
compiler and/or the support library.


> inside cost?
> outside cost?
> prologue peel iters?
> epilogye peel iters?
> Vector inside of loop cost?
> Calculated minimum iters for profitability: 8?

These debugging dumps are best read with reference to the source
code.

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux