RE: freeing NULL pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Cedric Roux <cedric.roux@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: freeing NULL pointer
From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 05:52:57 -0700
Cc: ranjith kumar <ranjithproxy@xxxxxxxxx>, "gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx" <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4BBF1D0B.4050205@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <u2v31cff80d1004090214hb4a109c3va74b781c071e87a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B7A6CC9992C4E4FB188D02872C90A6B8A01420B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<4BBF1D0B.4050205@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Cedric,

> Doesn't C99 (7.20.3.2) says passing NULL to free() just does nothing?

Could be.

I'm behind the times with C99.  I last used C in 1989.

I am not sure if the Standard C Library calls from C++ will comply with C99.

Sincerely,
--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: freeing NULL pointer
  - From: Nicholas Sherlock

References:
- freeing NULL pointer
  - From: ranjith kumar
- RE: freeing NULL pointer
  - From: John (Eljay) Love-Jensen
- Re: freeing NULL pointer
  - From: Cedric Roux

Prev by Date: Re: freeing NULL pointer
Next by Date: Avoid typename repetition in template specialization
Previous by thread: Re: freeing NULL pointer
Next by thread: Re: freeing NULL pointer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux