Fwd: Re: FW: gcc4.4.1 related doubt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bah!  here is the non bouncing version (I hope).

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: FW: gcc4.4.1 related doubt
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:38:20 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: trisha yad <trisha1march@xxxxxxxxx>, Jie Zhang <jie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxx, arm-gnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 03/26/2010 10:27 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
trisha yad<trisha1march@xxxxxxxxx>  writes:

arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -O2 test.c
I can see Function name  Convert to
0000842c t T.12

You still haven't explained what is wrong with that symbol.  Why does
it matter?

I thought I already said this, but here it is again:

Some broken Linux kernel build scripts flag the presence of these
symbols a something very bad.  If you try building a kernel containing
these scripts, you might be lead to think that the end of the world is near.

Obviously the way to fix the problem is to change GCC so it doesn't
trigger the emission of these messages in the defective kernels. :-)


David Daney

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux