Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
Joel Dice <dicej@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
This may be what you're looking for:
http://icculus.org/fatelf/
Those patches were not accepted into Linux and glibc,
and the author gave up.
http://osnews.com/story.php/22446/Ryan_Gordon_Halts_FatELF_Project
The incentive for combining 32- and 64-bit binaries is mighty slim; in
most cases where 32-bit is satisfactory, the 32-bit code runs as well or
better on the 64-bit OS, while the larger size binary detracts from any
advantage.
gcc has survived without providing much support for multiple paths, e.g.
non-SSE, SSE3, ... where the incentive might have been greater.
