Re: Dual Mode Binaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Brian D. McGrew" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Dual Mode Binaries
From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:57:04 +0200
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0912051157480.506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Joel Dice's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:58:54 -0700 (MST)")
References: <C73FDD2F.136E9%brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0912051157480.506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux)

Joel Dice <dicej@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This may be what you're looking for:
>
> http://icculus.org/fatelf/

Those patches were not accepted into Linux and glibc,
and the author gave up.

http://osnews.com/story.php/22446/Ryan_Gordon_Halts_FatELF_Project

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual Mode Binaries
  - From: Tim Prince

References:
- Dual Mode Binaries
  - From: Brian D. McGrew
- Re: Dual Mode Binaries
  - From: Joel Dice

Prev by Date: Re: Dual Mode Binaries
Next by Date: Re: Dual Mode Binaries
Previous by thread: Re: Dual Mode Binaries
Next by thread: Re: Dual Mode Binaries
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux