Re: One question about gcc fix_includes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



He Yunlong-B20256 wrote:

> 
> 	Glad to hear that, however, in my environment, the header files
> do exist, for example:
> 
> 	
> /opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.3.74-eglibc-2.8.74-dp-3/powerpc-none-linu
> x-gnuspe/powerpc-none-linux-gnuspe/libc/usr/include/features.h
> 	it contains:
> 	40	   _SVID_SOURCE         ISO C, POSIX, and SVID things.
> 	41	   _ATFILE_SOURCE       Additional *at interfaces.
> 	42	   _GNU_SOURCE          All of the above, plus GNU
> extensions.
> 
> 	However, in /usr/include/features.h, it contains following
> lines:
> 
> 	40	   _SVID_SOURCE         ISO C, POSIX, and SVID things.
>    	41	   _GNU_SOURCE          All of the above, plus GNU
> extensions. 
> 
> 	In generated gcc-4.3.2/build-gcc/gcc/include-fixed/features.h,
> following lines found: 
> 	1	/*  DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
>  	2
> 	3	    It has been auto-edited by fixincludes from:
> 	4
> 	5	        "/usr/include/features.h"
> 	6
> 	7	    This had to be done to correct non-standard usages
> in the
> 	8	    original, manufacturer supplied header file.  */
> 
> 	49	   _SVID_SOURCE         ISO C, POSIX, and SVID things.
> 	50	   _GNU_SOURCE          All of the above, plus GNU
> extensions.
> 
> 	I didn't change any fix-includes related files,  so that's what
> gcc compiling process does, is there anything wrong in my build process?

You didn't tell me how you built gcc, so I cannot know.  However, I
suspect that gcc did not see find headers in your sysroot.  What does
the features.h in your target's C library look like?

Andrew.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux