徐持恒 wrote: > But can you tell me why there are no testresult of MinGW or Cygwin on > gcc-testresults mailinglist ? > These topics hardly seems appropriate for gcc development; diverting to gcc-help. In your original message, you seemed to be aware that cygwin would be a more appropriate framework for running testsuite, but you wanted a test harness independent of cygwin. Then you confused me totally by suggesting that the mingw compiler should be built on newlib (a port of newlib to mingw? I'm not aware of any interest in that). I didn't see how that connected with your other topics. I thought the non-use of newlib and cygwin run-time was the central goal of mingw. I've been posting cygwin results on gcc-testresults regularly, but gcc-4.5 hasn't been building on cygwin the last 7 weeks. In the absence of support for 64-bit native compilation, usefulness of and interest in cygwin compiler continues to decline. I suppose it may drop off the secondary platform list, if it continues not to build. I didn't catch when or why make -j 4 test became broken on cygwin; it used to work well.
