i define an object from class base & call dosomthing & get gollowing
error:
request for member ‘dosomthing’ in ‘base’, which is of non-class type
‘Base*’
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 11:13 +0100, Axel Freyn wrote:
> Hi Mohsen
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:46:56AM +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> > Dear Axel,
> > given code doesn't work.
> I tried it now - it compiles and runs fine for me with gcc-4.4.1.
> What errors do you obtain?
>
> Axel
> > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 17:32 +0100, Axel Freyn wrote:
> > > Hi Mohsen,
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:40:45AM +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> > > > Suppose following code:
> > > > ////////////
> > > > char *var;
> > > > var = "class1"
> > > > ////////////
> > > > So, I don't know name of class1, but i have varibale var.How can i
> > > > create an object from class1 by this variavble?
> > > Sorry, now I understand the question:-)
> > > Well - I think the best way is the one proposed by Andrew: You first
> > > have to some kind of dictionary, which maps the names to the classes -
> > > this dictionary can't be created automatically in C++, but you have to
> > > write it yourself. And in addition, you have to supply a common
> > > base-class for all your classes. The following example (untested...)
> > > should explain the procedure:
> > >
> > > #include <iostream>
> > > #include <cstring>
> > > #include <cstdlib>
> > > class Base{
> > > public:
> > > virtual void DoSomething() = 0;
> > > };
> > > class A:public Base{
> > > public:
> > > void DoSomething(){std::cout << "A" << std::endl;}
> > > };
> > > class B:public Base{
> > > public:
> > > void DoSomething(){std::cout << "B" << std::endl;}
> > > };
> > > Base *Create(const char *name){
> > > if (strcmp(name, "A")==0)
> > > return new A;
> > > if (strcmp(name, "B")==0)
> > > return new B;
> > > exit(1);
> > > }
> > > int main(){
> > > Base *base;
> > > base = Create("A");
> > > base->DoSomething();
> > > delete base;
> > > base = Create("B");
> > > base->DoSomething();
> > > delete base;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Axel
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 10:55 +0100, Axel Freyn wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:31:05AM +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> > > > > > Oh, I forgot that i say i need to variable name of objects.same classes.
> > > > > > Therefor i need to variable name of objects & variable name of classes.
> > > > > > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:42 +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > We know that we can create an object with following code:
> > > > > > > /////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > > > > > > class_name *object_name = new() class_name;
> > > > > > > ///////////////////////////////////////////////
> > > > > > > So, i have a class pool,I wanna create Object with a variable name that
> > > > > > > variable is my class.Same:
> > > > > > > var *obj = new() var;
> > > > > > > var is a variable that contains a my class's name.
> > > > > > > How can i implement it?
> > > > > Well, I'm not sure I understand correctly, but I think the solution is
> > > > > derivation:
> > > > > class Base{};
> > > > > class A:public Base{};
> > > > > class B:public Base{};
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Then you can do:
> > > > > Base *var;
> > > > > var = new A;
> > > > > delete var;
> > > > > var = new B;
> > > > > delete B;
> > > > >
> > > > > All functions, which you want to call by accessing "var" (e.g.
> > > > > var->Function()) have to be defined as virtual function in class Base.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does that solve your problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > Axel
> > > >
> >
