Zdeněk Sojka <zsojka@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The problem may be in placing the symbol in wrong section group as > - .section .bss._ZGVZN1A4InitEvE1i,"awG",@nobits,_ZZN1A4InitEvE1i,comdat > + .section .bss._ZGVZN1A4InitEvE1i,"awG",@nobits,_ZGVZN1A4InitEvE1i,comdat > applied (at least to) file.s fixes the problem. In your test case as written there should not be any such section in file.s. file.h only includes header.h, and does not actually define any variables at all. The section group symbol looks right to me--the guard variable should be associated with the variable it is guarding, it shouldn't be in its own group. > Failing instruction is: > 0x0000000000400853 <_ZN1A4InitEv+63>: mov %rax,-0x40085a(%rip) # 0x0 > (writing to NULL) > which is > movq %rax, _ZZN1A4InitEvE1i(%rip) > in .s file If that is writing to NULL, it suggests that _ZZN1A4InitEvE1i (A::Init()::i) was somehow never defined. What do you see for that symbol using readelf -s on the executable and on the input object files? Ian
