kito <npickito@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I have some question about Conditional Execution Pattern. > In fact, I want to remove Conditional Execution in ARM for experimentation. > I have remove lots of Conditional Execution Pattern from arm.md > But I see a RTX that I can't understand. > > @(insn 74 79 80 ../../../gcc-live/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1848 (set > (reg:QI 18 r18 [320]) > @ (const_int 1 [0x1])) 169 {*arm_movqi_insn} > (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 1 [0x1]) > @ (nil))) > mov r18, #1 @ 74 *arm_movqi_insn/1 [length = 4] > @(jump_insn 80 74 729 ../../../gcc-live/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1848 (set (pc) > @ (if_then_else (ne (reg:CC 40 cc) > @ (const_int 0 [0x0])) > @ (label_ref 83) > @ (pc))) 220 {*arm_cond_branch} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CC 40 cc) > @ (expr_list:REG_BR_PROB (const_int 5000 [0x1388]) > @ (nil))) > -> 83) > @(insn 82 729 83 ../../../gcc-live/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1848 (set > (reg:QI 18 r18 [320]) > @ (const_int 0 [0x0])) 169 {*arm_movqi_insn} > (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 0 [0x0]) > @ (nil))) > moveq r18, #0 @ 82 *arm_movqi_insn/1 [length = 4] > > I don't know the expr_list:REG_EQUAL is how to generate, I have seem > it in expand pass. I'm not sure what your actual question is. REG_EQUAL is documented in the internals manual and in reg-notes.def. Ian