Re: Empty class for implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can you show some code?

-b


On 2/22/09 4:51 PM, "bastl73" <sebastian.bw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> I have now made an empty dummy class. The real classes now implements that
> dummy class and extend it like they need. So I have a basis to access all
> that classes with a dummy pointer.
> Now the linker says it has  "undefined reference"  of that dummy class and
> undefined reference to vtable.
> I think gcc does full optimisation and doesn't generate that empty dummy
> class.
> Is that a Bug?
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux