Re: Is the order of parse '?:' operator not defined?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is the order of parse '?:' operator not defined?
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:53:07 -0700
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <494E8120.7020008@xxxxxxxxxx> (Andrew Haley's message of "Sun\, 21 Dec 2008 17\:47\:12 +0000")
References: <200812211743.01414.dmixm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <494E8120.7020008@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Dmitry K. wrote:
>> Is the abort of program below correct?

Andrew> I think it 's a bug.  Forwarding to Tom tromey for comment.

I tried it with svn trunk and it worked fine.  This was probably fixed
by the fix for PR 35313.

Tom

References:
- Is the order of parse '?:' operator not defined?
  - From: Dmitry K.
- Re: Is the order of parse '?:' operator not defined?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Prev by Date: Re: Is the order of parse '?:' operator not defined?
Next by Date: Re: Optimization o2 vs o3 issue
Previous by thread: Re: Is the order of parse '?:' operator not defined?
Next by thread: c grammar
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux