Scott L. Burson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Scott L. Burson wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Scott L. Burson wrote: >>>>> No, I'll only get a 64-bit stage 1. >>>> Which is all you need. >>>> >>>> --disable-bootstrap and there is no stage 2. >>> Oh! Didn't know about that. >>> >>> But what about the next problem I ran into -- that the compiler built >>> in this way works only when -m64 is specified, because the libraries >>> are all 64-bit? >> It all depends on how the multilibs are configured. > > No, I don't mean that the build process only attempts to build 64-bit > libraries; I mean that even the libraries that the build process > intends to build as 32-bit get built as 64-bit also. I don't see how you managed that. Unless your target defaults to 64-bit, this is impossible. Andrew.
