Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy) wrote: > Is it necessary to use the local native compiler - xlc in this case, to > compile gcc ? I have a gcc-4.2.3 installed on AIX and would now like to > install gcc 4.3.2. However if I compile with existing gcc then the > compiles is extremly slow and almost does not do much. It took about a > day to just finish stage-1. I tried to check for any load etc but could > not find any issues with the node. Even rebooted and restarted the > compiles still the same issue. Then I switched to the native xlc and xlC > compilers, the make was fast but got the following error : > > "./config.h", line 435.9: 1506-213 (S) Macro name inline cannot be > redefined. > "./config.h", line 435.9: 1506-358 (I) "inline" is defined on line 182 > of /cots/gnu/gcc-4.3.2/libiberty/../include/ansidecl.. > make[3]: *** [pex-common.o] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/cots/gnu/build-4.3.2/libiberty' > make[2]: *** [all-stage1-libiberty] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/cots/gnu/build-4.3.2' > > Any ideas as to what the above is. Well, you know, if I were there I would have actually looked inside ./config.h" to see what xlc was complaining about. It might be interesting. You could try that. And if you find out that inline is being incorrectly redefined, you could fix it. Andrew.
