Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
There is one workaround that I've found, which is to call the macro like this: char str1[20], *str2; .... str2 = S_OR(&str1, ""); This makes the 'promotion' to 'char *' explicit, and resolves the issue.
...but isn't the code wrong? typeof(&str1) =~ char**, not char*? What about this (untested WAG): typeof(*(&a)) __x = a; - or - typeof(&(a[0])) __x = a; // a must be pointer or array -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- In the beginning, there were not enough colors. -- Guy Keren
