Re[2]: Lazy linking.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re[2]: Lazy linking.
From: Kirill Pekarov <kirill_pekarov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:30:36 +0300
In-reply-to: <C4C8A6E1.7CEC%eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1266807070.20080813224632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4C8A6E1.7CEC%eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kirill_pekarov <kirill_pekarov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi, Eljay.

You wrote 13.08.2008, 22:57:37:

> It appears that somewhere in your link line, you've made a SSO dependency on
> the DLL you wanted to be DSO (via dlopen).

Thank you very much!
Now I see how it should be.


-- 
Best regards,

References:
- Lazy linking.
  - From: Kirill Pekarov
- Re: Lazy linking.
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

Prev by Date: Can I control the output section for constant strings?
Next by Date: Re: External variables in shared library constructor code
Previous by thread: Re: Lazy linking.
Next by thread: Migrating from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux