Well, thanks:
But, I just want to use Intel-Style ASM in there. with dest, src setup.
Since I do quite a lot of Revercing and well I sometimes need to Copy
Directly from Olly/IDA into C Code.
Since that uses Intel I need the intel.
Also, Well as you saw I used Pointers to Variables in my C Code. I didnt
find a way to do that in GCC C Compiler.
I never heard of the -masm line. I am going to read up on that.
Thanks already, I hope I made my question a bit clearer now.
Cheers,
Robin
Bob Plantz wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 04:11 -0700, Robin-Vossen wrote:
>
> I'm not aware of any use of the inc instruction that takes two operands:
>
>> __asm{
>> mov eax, [INTEGER]
>> inc eax, esp
>> mov [INTEGER], eax
>> mov [CHARACTER], ah
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> so I don't completely understand your code.
>
> Have you tried -masm=intel? I've only gone as far as seeing that it
> generates intel-style asm from C/C++. I decided that it was better to
> follow the "when in Rome..." rule.
>
> The syntax issue seems arbitrary to me. I've used lots of assemblers.
> They're all different.
>
> For several years in the 1980s I had contracts with two companies that
> used different chips. One assembler used source,destination and the
> other destination,source. I would work with one in the morning, the
> other in the afternoon. Just had to be careful.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GNU-C%2B%2B-Inline-Assembler-tp18912389p18929255.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
