Arf no... Here is my compile option :) g++ -march=nocona -Wall -Wfloat-equal -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wconversion -Wextra -Wreorder -Wold-style-cast -Winit-self -pedantic -Wreturn-type -Wunreachable-code -D REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE test.c -o test > Implicit conversion are a nice thing to have ;-). Yeah sure , but I prefer the secure way ;) -----Message d'origine----- De : gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Sven Eschenberg Envoyé : jeudi 22 mai 2008 10:57 À : Laurent Dufréchou Cc : gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx Objet : Re: G++/GCC not detetcing stupid errors in code. You are looking for -Wconversion I guess. Implicit conversion are a nice thing to have ;-). Regards -Sven Laurent Dufréchou schrieb: > Hi there, > > I?m using g++ for the first time via gcc 4.1.2. > I?ve written a little code (first C++ oriented and because guys with which I > work come from C, it is slightly modified to compile with G++ and gcc) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > //#include <iostream> > #include <stdio.h> > > //using namespace std; > > int main() > > { > > int toto; > > short tata; > > toto = 1111118; > > tata = toto; //error 1! > > //cout << toto << "tata:" << tata << endl; > > printf("%d %i",toto,tata); > > //return 0; //error 2 because no return > > } > > > > I i compile with gcc (cc), it detects no int returned error (OK good point) > But the downcast (tata = toto) doesn?t raise any warning! > > If I use G++ the downcast is not detected and even more the return is not > also detected (!) > > I was thining that Gcc was really strict and I choose it because I was > thinking that, I?m quite disappointed :/ > I?ve tried ?Wall ?Wextra ?pedantic + a ton of other switch with no luck? > > Do i miss something ? > > How can I put Gcc in ?user is stupid I need to check all? mode? > > > Laurent > >
