Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
From: Rick Mann <rmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:02:14 -0800
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071204235446.GJ17368@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <8BD833AA-8B16-4B4E-B9E7-49D6670E68C4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071202144507.GW17368@xxxxxxxxxx> <C08359D2-FEEE-4061-9901-0002E9167204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071204235446.GJ17368@xxxxxxxxxx>


On Dec 4, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:

It looks like the hack doesn't work. If you don't need gprof,deleting
combined/gprof is probably the easiest way around that problem.

I'll consider that. In the meantime, I just deleted the three *.mfiles and it seemed to build fine after that.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

References:
- Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
  - From: Rick Mann
- Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
  - From: Rick Mann
- Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

Prev by Date: Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
Next by Date: Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
Previous by thread: Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
Next by thread: Re: Need help building combined gcc/binutils/newlib
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux