On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:12:38PM -0800, Rick Mann wrote:
> binutils-2.17 is fine. So, I downloaded that and tried again, and got
> MUCH farther, but still ran into some errors:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -c -o flat_bl.o ../../combined/gprof/flat_bl.m
> ../../combined/gprof/flat_bl.m:2: error: syntax error before ‘%’ token
> make[4]: *** [flat_bl.o] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [all-gprof] Error 2
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> I'm not sure what a .m file is. For Mac OS X, .m is an Objective-C
> file. However, this file does not look like Objective-C to me. Not
> sure what it's supposed to be. There is a .c file with the same name
> in the same dir.
>
> My tools' versions (Mac OS X's Xcode 3.0):
Hmm, notice that gprof/Makefile.am says:
----
# This empty rule is a hack against gmake patched by Apple.
%.o:%.m
.m.c:
awk -f $(srcdir)/gen-c-prog.awk > ./$*.c \
FUNCTION=`(echo $*|sed -e 's,.*/,,g' -e 's/_bl//')`_blurb \
FILE=$*.m $(srcdir)/$*.m
----
It looks like the hack doesn't work. If you don't need gprof, deleting
combined/gprof is probably the easiest way around that problem.
--
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year
