Joe Hoffert writes: > You're right that using gcj or g++ to link doesn't matter. The > difference with what I was doing before was the compiler/linker > options. Can you let us know what in our instructions didn't give you the information you needed? It might help us improve our documentation. > One more question. Is there any advantage to converting a .jar > library to a .so library and using it as opposed to simply using > the original .jar file with the Java invocation API and the JNI to > call back to C++ from Java? I thought I would get a performance > increase with using the .so library but perhaps there are no > substantive differences between the two approaches. You will probably get a performance increase, yes. In particular, calling native code from compiled code is very quick. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
