At 14:41 24.09.2007 +0200, Kövesdi György wrote:
>> If the destructor is not inline, and also is not provided in that same
>
>It is used in an embedded application, and because the mentioned destructor is
>compiled into one machine-code instruction, it would be a big wastage not to
>inline it.
>The class mentioned in my example and the variable are refer to hardware
>registers, which are in connection by hardware, and (of course) the accessing
>order is important.
>Is there any possibility to tell the compiler such a dependency?
That's only a guess, I haven't tried it, but what about:
{
class c;
{
other stuff;
}
}
Shouldn't gcc then call the destructor of c after other stuff? Or can it still
reorder it if optimizing?
bye Fabi
