Kövesdi György wrote: >> If the destructor is not inline, and also is not provided in that same >> > > It is used in an embedded application, and because the mentioned destructor is > compiled into one machine-code instruction, it would be a big wastage not to > inline it. > The class mentioned in my example and the variable are refer to hardware > registers, which are in connection by hardware, and (of course) the accessing > order is important. > Is there any possibility to tell the compiler such a dependency? > use the "volatile" keyword to tell the compiler not to optimize access to a variable. Maybe that will work with a class too... who knows I don't code C++... Tom
