Re: Similarities between gcc and binutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/07, Brian Dessent <brian@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NightStrike wrote:

> I recently submitted my first bug and patch to gcc
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32532), and it dealt with
> an unused variable in libiberty/argv.c.  I just found out that the
> same condition exists at the same line in the same file for binutils.
> Are these files supposed to be in sych somehow?  Am I supposed to
> submit the bug to both products?

No.  The gcc copy of libiberty is the master; whoever commits the patch
to the gcc tree is supposed to commit it to the src tree too at the same
time (or find someone to do it for them.)

Ok, so my work should be done, then, for the bug I submitted, correct?

Thanks to all helping out.  Obviously this is beyond trivial, but it
provides a good learning ground for how I should go about things in
the future.  Ditto for anyone reading these threads.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux