Kövesdi György wrote: > Hi, > > In addition to wasting space, creating unnecessary instances of destructors > may lead to other problems (especially for embedded systems): some > destructors call the operator delete(void*). So, the corresponding libraries > will be linked in the resulting code. Some amount of space could be saved > avoiding the use of operators new() and delete(). It would be useful to be > able to disable those destructors somehow. 1) I am not sure if I understand your problem. Can you give an exampel for such an (automatically generated) destructore that implicitly calls delete? 2) If they aren't necessary anyway, why don't you just provide your own (empty) implementations of new and delete to avoid the inclusion of whatever runtime library? Daniel
