Olivier Langlois wrote:
I am finding this thread very interesting to follow
So am I! It's fun to see what a lively (and informative!) discussion my simple question caused. :-)
but I am surprised that nobody mentioned const_cast<> as it is the official way to cast away the volatile specifier. Is this because the problem is in C?
Since const_cast is not supported in C, and I am writing in C, that seems likely. :-)
I think at some point I actually asked 'what is the C equivalent of const_cast<>' (but I'm not sure if I actually posted that or just thought it...).
-- Matthew "unsubscribe me plz!!" -- Newbies
