RE: Signatures Was: where can I get gcc optimizations information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Andrew (once again),

> Such disclaimers are inappropriate for mail sent to public lists. If
> your company automatically adds something like this to outgoing mail,
> and you can't convince them to stop, you might consider using a free
> web-based e-mail account.

I have at least two of these, and they're both banned here at work, hence
my point about people not being able to interact with the list, who work
in such organisations.

Regards,
David.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Haley [mailto:aph@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 12 March 2007 16:40
> To: CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM
> Cc: 'Sunzir Deepur'; gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Signatures Was: where can I get gcc 
> optimizations information
> 
> CARTER-HITCHIN, David, GBM writes:
>  > Hi Andrew et al.,
>  > 
>  > > > This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the 
>  > > > addressee only. 
>  > 
>  > > Please do not send such attachments to this list.  We 
> cannot read your
>  > > mails.
>  > 
>  > Why not? The addressee is the list and all the members of 
> that list.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html:
> 
> 
> Policies
> 
> Please do not include or reference confidentiality notices, like:
> 
>     The referring document contains privileged and confidential
>     information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
>     disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it, and we
>     request that you notify companyname immediately.
> 

> 
> Andrew.
> 

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux