Thank you, Eljay. BTW: Would this cause an error on older versions of gcc, too? Or only on 4.x? Regards, Oliver Am Dienstag, 20. Februar 2007 20:50 schrieben Sie: > Hi Oliver, > > This is not legit: > > ((zend_bool)(*retval).value.lval) = objval->active; > > ...nor this... > > ((zend_bool)(*retval).value.lval) = objval->parent_access;; > > I'm not sure what zval looks like. Probably needs to be implemented in a > way that is C (ISO 9899) compliant. > > HTH, > --Eljay
