RE: invalid lvalue in assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Oliver Block" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: invalid lvalue in assignment
From: "John \(Eljay\) Love-Jensen" <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:50:16 -0800
References: <200702202037.17543.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Oliver,

This is not legit:

((zend_bool)(*retval).value.lval) = objval->active;

...nor this...

((zend_bool)(*retval).value.lval) = objval->parent_access;;

I'm not sure what zval looks like.  Probably needs to be implemented in a way that is C (ISO 9899) compliant.

HTH,
--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  - From: Oliver Block

References:
- Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  - From: Oliver Block

Prev by Date: Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
Next by Date: Re: Instruction scheduling
Previous by thread: Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
Next by thread: Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux