Lin George <george4academic@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Do you think to link with static libc is a solution? I know how to > link with a static library by using -static. My question is how to > link with libc static library, because I have never done it before > -- I think there must be something special for link with libc > itself. I am wondering where is the location of the libc static lib? > what should be the lib name, something like this -- all specific to > libc itself. (Please don't top post. Thanks.) If you link with a static libc, then you will not have to worry about running the program on a program with a different dynamic libc. To link with a static libc, just link with -static. You don't have to do anything else. That will link with libc.a rather than libc.so. Ian
