RE: Hazard Detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of zneda@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:44 AM
> To: gnu@xxxxxxx; gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: neda.zf@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Hazard Detection
> 
> Hi
> 
> I have a question: I compiled a program with  gcc -mips1 ,
> Compiler generate this list of instructions:
>    ...               ....               ...
>   10b71c:    87a20018      lh        v0,24(sp)
>   10b720:    00000000     nop
>   10b724:    144000b9     bnez    v0,10ba0c
>   10b728:    0015ac03      sra      s5,s5,0x10
>    ...               ....               ...
> 
> but by a small change, some times in variables, (using same compiler
> switches) compiler don't insert  nop between load and branch and
generates
> this sequence of instructions:
>    ...               ....               ...
>   10b754:    87a20018     lh         v0,24(sp)
>   10b758:    144000b9     bnez     v0,10ba40
>   10b75c:    0015ac03      sra       s5,s5,0x10
>    ...               ....               ...
> 
> would you please tell me the reason?
> 
> why doesn't compiler detect hazard always?
> 
> Thanks in advanced.

I haven't programmed in the MIPS for awhile, but when I did, GCC
expected the assembler to do the hazard detection (ie, if you
disassemble the object code, there should be a NOP between the lh and
the bnez if -mips1 was passed to the assembler.  GCC used to have a
separate hazard detection pass many years ago, but it was removed when
GAS added the support.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux