Has this idea come up before? Instead of: class foo { private: bar field; public: foo() : field(0) { } }; allow a syntax like: class foo { private: bar field(0); public: foo() { } }; This seems "more better" to me. Perry
Has this idea come up before? Instead of: class foo { private: bar field; public: foo() : field(0) { } }; allow a syntax like: class foo { private: bar field(0); public: foo() { } }; This seems "more better" to me. Perry