Re: make install prefix=XXX to different prefix gives errors using gcc-4_1-branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian Dessent wrote:
Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:


So do I, but installing to a different location to where the package was
configured for is a feature that the GCC build system supports.  I've used
specifying a different prefix= argument to make to what I supplied in
configure many times, so therefore this is a bug.


But the correct way to do this is not to override "prefix", but to
specify DESTDIR.  But note this should only be used for e.g. making a
binary package.  It probably would fail in strange ways if you actually
tried to use the resulting binaries in their DESTDIR location, instead
of just tarring them up or whatever.

/path/to/configure --prefix=/desired/prefix
make
make install DESTDIR=/tmp/foobar

Brian




Ah.....

Actually, I'm writing an installation script that automatically downloads/compiles/installs gcc-4.1 from SVN. And the same location (/usr/local/gcc) is also holding or is going to hold other versions of gcc (4.0.2, 2.95.3) and I want them all to co-exist as gcc-2.95.3, g++-4.1.0, etc. I rename the files from the DESTDIR/bin/XXX to /usr/local/gcc/bin/XXX-4.1.0 etc., and do the same with the man pages so they can co-exist with other versions (so I know which compiler takes which flags, etc.) I'd rather not do a straight make install and then rename/delete in the target directory - too messy. I'd rather just copy across the files I need.

I didn't know about the make install DESTDIR=XXX - I've been using make install prefix=XXX for AGES. Ah well, you live and learn.

Thanks


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux