Re: Control reaches end of non-void function: why only a warning?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dixit Oliver Kullmann (2005-11-15 16:30):
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:23:15AM -0500, Pierre Sarrazin wrote:
> > The following code generates the warning "control reaches end of
> > non-void function" under g++ 3.4.2:
> > 
> > int g()
> > {
> > }
> > 
> > Why is this only a warning and not an error?
> 
> Simply because this is legal code.

Interesting.  Do you happen to have a source I could go read myself?
It seems like I need a refresher course...

I asked someone to compile this code under Visual Studio .Net and
that compiler gives an error (C4716: "must return a value").

I understand that we sometimes want to code functions like this one:

int f()
{
    exit(1);
}

But that seems relatively rare, and I for one would not mind being
forced to add a dummy return statement after the call to exit().
The benefit of having a more rigorous compiler would outweigh this
slight inconvenience.

-- 
Pierre Sarrazin <sarrazip at sympatico dot ca>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux