Mws wrote:
>On Tuesday 01 November 2005 11:01, Dima Sorkin wrote:
>
>
>>>i'll think i'll implement my own templates for the std::<classes> with
>>>extended safety.
>>>
>>>
>> Before you do it, try debug mode of STLport (www.stlport.org).
>>It is almost paranoidal mode, it checks things you could not even
>>fantasize about.
>>
>>Regards,
>> Dima.
>>
>>
>>
>yes, i downloaded it and had a look at the source:
>
> void pop_back() {
> --this->_M_finish;
> _Destroy(this->_M_finish);
> }
>
>the same unchecked stuff :)
>
>
>
Just to point it out, if you check the debugging version (it lives in
debug/vector), the function looks like:
void
pop_back()
{
__glibcxx_check_nonempty();
iterator __victim = end() - 1;
__victim._M_invalidate();
_Base::pop_back();
}
Some nice checking there :)
Chris
