On Tuesday 01 November 2005 11:01, Dima Sorkin wrote:
> > i'll think i'll implement my own templates for the std::<classes> with
> > extended safety.
> Before you do it, try debug mode of STLport (www.stlport.org).
> It is almost paranoidal mode, it checks things you could not even
> fantasize about.
>
> Regards,
> Dima.
>
yes, i downloaded it and had a look at the source:
void pop_back() {
--this->_M_finish;
_Destroy(this->_M_finish);
}
the same unchecked stuff :)
so, still there is the option to have my own classes.
sometimes, standards are of a crazy design imho.
performance does matter _all_ time,
safety, code reduction is like an unreal feature.
thus better do reinvent a wheel by creating your own kind of STL?
know all issues and trapdoors.
if you fall into one, wonder and wonder,
have look at bits/.....h and find out,
that a sigsegv is not caused by the push_back(T),
but by a long time ago pop_back() at totally different position of source.
regards
marcel
Attachment:
pgp0zeANw7fxP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
