On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:12:37PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > This patch happens to fix it in 4.0. I doubt this is the right > approach, though. It's a big hammer, which says that if you set a > pointer to the address of something, and you're not sure what that > thing is, then you have no idea what the pointer points to. Thank you very much. Even if it isn't the right approach, it worked great for me. > This code is completely different in 4.1. In 4.1 the function > find_what_p_points_to is called, and it determines that it has no idea > what 'ptr' points to. Ah, that's good to know. Trying that I indeed had no problems.
