Re: Questions about const.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ryan Lortie <desrt@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> GCC generates some warnings when doing type conversions in places that I
> don't believe the warnings are required.  It'd be be cool if someone
> could explain it to me.  I have an example program here:
> 
> http://manic.desrt.ca/const.c
> 
> I'm guessing that, by the C standard, arrays that contain items of
> different types are always considered incompatible and since 'char *'
> and 'const char *' are different types then 'const char **' and 'char
> **' are incompatible pointers.  This just doesn't seem very useful when
> one of the base types is always safe to automatically promote to the
> other (in this case, char * -> const char *) and there is no chance that
> an unnoticed conversion could ever occur in the other direction without
> generating another warning/error.

As you say, this is from the C standard.  gcc tries to follow the
standard.

Ian

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux