Re: Non-void function not having an explicit value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Neo Anderson <neo_in_matrix@xxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Non-void function not having an explicit value
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:16:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <BAY106-F1831299136FA2FB474C37EBDE00@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY106-F1831299136FA2FB474C37EBDE00@phx.gbl>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Neo,

The C++ standard specifies that main has an implicit "return 0;" at the end, if one is not provided.

HTH,
--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-void function not having an explicit value
  - From: Neo Anderson

References:
- Non-void function not having an explicit value
  - From: Neo Anderson

Prev by Date: Re: Problem configuring gcc 4.0.0
Next by Date: Re: Non-void function not having an explicit value
Previous by thread: Non-void function not having an explicit value
Next by thread: Re: Non-void function not having an explicit value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux