On Wed, 18 May 2005 11:06:23 -0500 Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Fred, > > >However, if I declare index and doublesIter before the for, then all > >works fine. Is that a bug? > > Nope, not a bug. What you have here is a case of bad C++ code. > > #1 > int x, y; // This is good. > > #2 > int x; std::vector<double>::iterator y; // This is good. > > #3 > std::vector<double>::iterator x, y; // This is good. > > #4 > int x, std::vector<double>::iterator y; // This is not good. > > You can't put #2 in a for-loop initialization expression (since it's > two expressions). > > #1 and #3 won't do what you want. > > #4 isn't C++, whether inside or outside of a for-loop initialization > expression.. But you can have: for (int i, int j; ...) Seen examples of that in Josuttis' OO programming in C++ (while I was verifying whether I could have several declerations in the for). Fred
