Re: "No matching function" -- not finding copy constructor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(moving to gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx)

Paul Koning schrieb:
I'm upgrading to V4.0.0 and struggling with some code that's seriously
into templates.  One puzzling error is this one:

keyed_obj.hh:159: error: no matching function for call to 'CxnIndex::CxnIndex(CxnIndex)'
Indeces.hh:150: note: candidates are: CxnIndex::CxnIndex(CxnIndex&)

this is not a copy constructor, CxnIndex(CxnIndex const &) is...

Indeces.hh:145: note: ... and some more


...so these would be interesting.
CxnIndex(CxnIndex &) only accepts non-const l-values.


It's not entirely clear to me why something very much like a copy constructor is being invoked in the first place. But the bigger puzzle is: why isn't the copy constructor being matched? I would have thought that any call with a T argument should match a function or method with an &T argument in its declaration...


-- Stefan Strasser

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux