On Saturday 09 April 2005 6:04 pm, Stefan Strasser wrote:
> Christian Parpart schrieb:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm not sure that I ran into a bug, but I'm quite sure about that -
> > because the other way around just looks ugly.
> >
> > When using CXXFLAGS="-fvisibility=hidden" and declaring the following in
> > a file for a shared library:
> >
> > #define MY_API __attribute__((visibility("default")))
> >
> > template<class T>
> > MY_API class U {
> > public:
> > void f(T v);
> > };
>
> listen to your compiler:
> c++template-visibility.h:19: warning: attribute ignored in declaration
> of 'class TFoo<T>'
> c++template-visibility.h:19: warning: attribute for 'class TFoo<T>' must
> follow the 'class' keyword
>
> and note that you can only export instantiations of templates.
Okay, I did s,MY_API class,class MY_API. Now, when using colorgcc, I even saw
the warning you hinted me :)
However, when playing a bit around, I see, that I've to explicitely do:
template<class T>
void FOO_API TFoo<T>::bar(const T& var) {
std::cout << "TFoo::bar(" << var << ")" << std::endl;
}
that is, adding the FOO_API right into the .cpp file's function implementation
to get this working.
Is this really supposed to be required? Well, I specified FOO_API in the .h
file between class and TFoo to achieve this. So, I wonder why I've to add
FOO_API in the function implementations header, too.
Regards,
Christian Parpart.
--
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
17:10:29 up 17 days, 6:16, 1 user, load average: 0.58, 0.96, 0.79
Attachment:
pgpN0nRt3lyHU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
