"Liza Atkin" <latkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But the main thing is that I followed your advice concerning the > UNITS_PER_WORD definition and it did not have any influence whatsoever > on addresses' indexation and I thought maybe you could think of additional > components that influence the offset. I am surprised at that. I would expect that changing BITS_PER_UNIT and UNITS_PER_WORD would do it. I recommend building the c4x-rtems target, and take a look at the code and RTL that it generates, and compare it to what you are getting. That target has similar characteristics. Ian
