I would like to thank everyone for their involvement in helping me pin-point the issue. I would like to especially thanks Eljay for his in-depth involvement and emails. I believe that I can make-do with a solution now without major shifts in our library. Corey On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:11:22 -0600, corey taylor <corey.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks you all for replying to my question. > > It seems my source for testing had issues getting to you, and it did > have extra stuff that probably didn't need to be there. > > I was hoping one of you could suggest a way for use to get around the > problem 3.4's apparant two-pass system provides. > > We provided templated utility classes, such as G3D::Table for doing hash maps. > > This class relies on an overloaded function, currently, to provide the > hash'ed key of the class or typename in question. > > -- > > The reason we have the issue is because we want to be able to use > classes hidden in .cpp files, and not in the general header. Also, we > want users to be able to provide their own hashcode functions for > their own classes. > > G++ 3.4, however, seems to want to know everything in Table.h before > it can be used. We cannot provide the class and then the overloaded > function in a separate .cpp file before we use it. or g++ gives us a > "cannot find overloaded function" error. > > Corey >
