On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > ok that seems to be an easier way to handle things. I'm wondering which > will work better when configuring gcc use --with-prefix=/opt/gcc-2.95.3 > and when configuring binutils use --with-prefix=/opt/binutils-2.15 this > would keep everything contained to their own directories or gcc use > --with-prefix=/opt/gnu and binutils use --with-prefix=/opt/gnu ..... would > the latter work as well seeing how both gcc and binutils have common > components? Each package needs a different --with-prefix option. That's the least risky way to do it. You can settle any conflicts with your $PATH, and you can even try differernt gcc's with different binutil's that way. Though doing --with-prefix=/opt/gnu/gcc-2.95.3 --with-prefix=/opt/gnu/binutils-2.15 ... ... wouldn't be a bad idea, so you can just tar up /opt/gnu. -- DDDD DK KD DKK D Bush/Cheney '04: Putting the "Con" in Conservative DK KD DDDD
